January 27, 2026|ט' שבט ה' אלפים תשפ"ו A Full-Page Ad and a Photo Op: Is Ye's Apology Enough?
Print Article
This week, Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, took out a full page advertisement in The Wall Street Journal titled, “To Those I’ve Hurt.” In it, he addressed years of publicly documented antisemitic remarks and behavior, admitted that his untreated bipolar type 1 disorder following an earlier brain injury contributed to a period in which he lost touch with reality and made deeply harmful statements, and expressed remorse, claimed commitment to accountability and change, and insisted that he is not antisemitic.
Our tradition most certainly believes in the possibility of repentance and repair. But Teshuva, return, is not merely saying or publishing, “I am sorry.” It is a rigorous and demanding moral process that asks us to confront the damage we caused, accept responsibility, and change our behavior so that the harm is not repeated. What separates a meaningful apology from an empty one is not eloquence, but evidence.
A true apology begins with responsibility without qualification. It must say, “I did this and it was wrong.” It centers the experience of those harmed rather than the internal struggles of the one who caused the harm. In Ye’s letter he frames his conduct through the lens of untreated illness, claiming that his judgment was impaired. Mental illness is real and deserves compassion. But explanation is not the same as accountability. Jewish ethics insists that even when there are contributing factors, the pain inflicted on others must remain at the center of the apology. The harmed are not required to accept context before they are acknowledged.
Our tradition also teaches that, importantly, an apology is not a single moment but rather the beginning of a process. Repair often requires repetition, humility, and patience. These factors matter because this is not Ye’s first apology. There have been previous expressions of regret, including public statements and gestures toward the Jewish community. Yet those apologies were followed by further statements and actions that reopened wounds and reinforced distrust.
Judaism is clear on this point. Teshuva is measured not by how convincingly one apologizes but by whether one acts differently when given the chance.
Words without behavioral change remain words. The Talmud teaches that repentance must be manifested in deeds. In personal relationships, an apology that is not accompanied by change lacks credibility. The same is true on a communal and global stage. When harm has been broadcast to millions, repair must also be visible, sustained, and proportional.
There is also a deeper moral challenge that must be confronted. In his bestselling book “The Sunflower,” Simon Wiesenthal recounts his work camp experience of being brought to a dying Nazi soldier’s bedside. The man turned to Wiesenthal and confessed his crimes and horrific wrongdoings against the Jewish people. He then asked Wiesenthal to serve as a representative of all his victims and begged forgiveness. Wiesenthal describes that he could not grant the soldier his wish because some things are simply too heinous and atrocious to forgive. Wiesenthal describes that the rest of his life, he remained tortured by that request and by his reaction to it.
When harm is inflicted upon an entire people, forgiveness is no longer a private exchange. It becomes a collective moral dilemma.
Ye is not a Nazi soldier, but his hateful words do not exist in a vacuum. His comments, tweets, interviews and music reach millions. His past comments amplified antisemitic tropes, normalized conspiracy theories, and emboldened those already inclined toward hate. That level of harm cannot be undone with a single full-page advertisement, no matter how prominent the platform or how carefully chosen the language. Exposure on that scale leaves scars that linger long after the apology fades from public view.
Repentance and forgiveness are not achieved through optics. A photo op with a celebrity rabbi is not evidence of remorse, just as a full page advertisement is not proof of transformation. Forgiveness cannot be purchased with access, visibility, or carefully staged gestures. It must be earned slowly through sincerity, consistency, and humility. Teshuva does not happen in a moment and it is not secured through symbolism alone. The longer the hate was expressed and the deeper the damage inflicted, the more time is required and the greater the demonstration of change must be evidenced before trust can begin to return.
Performative gestures may create headlines, but they do not heal communities. When repentance is reduced to an image or a moment it risks becoming transactional rather than transformational. What matters is not who one stands next to for a photograph but what one stands for consistently when the cameras are gone.
This moment has produced divided responses within the Jewish community. Some have responded with gratitude, embracing Ye’s apology and implicitly presenting themselves as speaking on behalf of the entire Jewish people in granting acceptance and forgiveness. Others have moved just as quickly in the opposite direction dismissing the apology outright or labeling it opportunistic, insincere, or fraudulent. But perhaps both reactions arrive too early.
There is no single Jewish voice authorized to accept or reject repentance on behalf of all Jews, especially when the harm was global and the wounds unevenly distributed. Forgiveness in such cases cannot be rushed nor can it be crowdsourced in the immediate aftermath of a public statement.
Our sages taught kabdeihu v’chashdeihu, treat a person with generosity while also exercising caution. Judaism allows for optimism without naivety and hope without surrendering discernment. We can acknowledge the possibility of sincerity while remaining appropriately skeptical, especially when the harm was extensive, repeated, and amplified over time.
This is why teshuva demands more than statements of intent. Rather than telling us what he plans to do next, the more meaningful path forward is simply to do it. Let Ye use his influence to advocate consistently and publicly for the Jewish people and for the Jewish state. Speak out forcefully against antisemitism wherever it appears, especially when it comes from allies or audiences that are harder to challenge. Withdraw songs and delete content that spews hate no matter how popular they have become or how inconvenient to eliminate. Support education that exposes the lies of hatred and teaches the real human cost of antisemitism. Stand alongside those targeted, not once, but repeatedly, visibly, and without qualification.
Teshuva is not performed in headlines. It is lived through sustained action over time. Ye himself asks for patience and understanding as he seeks his way forward. Judaism recognizes that transformation takes time and when repentance is genuine we are commanded to welcome it. But welcome does not require naivete. Caution is not cynicism. It is wisdom shaped by experience.
If Ye’s apology is sincere it will be proven not by another letter but by a consistent pattern of behavior that repairs rather than retraumatizes. The longer the hate persisted and the deeper the damage inflicted the longer the road back must be and the clearer the evidence of change needs to be.
Only through time action and demonstrated transformation can the question Wiesenthal posed begin to find its answer. Until then words alone are not enough.